European Platform Against Trafficking in Human Beings


LSI Opinion - Trafficking in the media


Although La Strada International generally welcomes increased attention to the issue of trafficking in the public arena, unbalanced media coverage on trafficking can also create false perceptions and damage the interests of trafficked persons rather than servicing them. Two different problems in this regard are:

  • the portrayal of women and violence in the media, in particular with regard to agency and the victimisation of women, and
  • the portrayal of the scope and nature of trafficking, in particular with regard to estimates of the number of trafficked persons and its occurrence in the sex industry or other economic sectors.

With regard to the portrayal of trafficked women in the media, La Strada has noted the tendency of portraying women as helpless victims who have been forced to migrate and work in the sex industry. These depictions  - including public awareness-raising campaigns by governments or NGOs  - often include imagery of women’s bodies in chains, battered, scantily dressed or even processed like goods or packaged like animals. Although La Strada understands that the public and policy-makers needs to be informed about the extent of exploitation through trafficking, La Strada also firmly believes that this kind of imagery enhances the objectification of women by depicting them as commodities and disempowers them by portraying them as helpless victims without any agency. Anti-trafficking work should be based on the principle of empowerment, with the intention of increasing peoples’ and/or communities’ capacities to exert influence over their own lives. This includes women who have been trafficked into the sex industry.


With regard to the public portrayal of the scope and nature of trafficking, La Strada has noted tendencies in the media as well as in government actions to not base claims made on sound empirical research or facts derived from direct social assistance work by anti-trafficking NGOs and other service providers. There are a lot of statistics on the number of trafficked persons in the world, which are mostly based on estimations only and therefore not reliable. Victims are often not identified as trafficked persons at all and only seen as unwanted (irregular) migrants. Furthermore, because of the clandestine nature of the phenomenon, it is impossible to get a complete picture of the numbers of people involved and their circumstances.

It is also impossible to tell if human trafficking (whether in a given country or in the whole world) is increasing or decreasing. Even if more victims are identified, more calls received at hotlines or more traffickers sentenced, this can also mean that there is more awareness or that the issue is high on a government’s agenda and the institutions work better together to prevent and counteract the phenomenon.

Latest news

LSI joins calls for the UN to address human rights violations in Belarus

La Strada International has joined civil society from across Europe such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch to call on the UN Human Rights Council to convene a Special Session to address the human rights violations committed in the lead up to the 2020 Presidential elections in Belarus.

Brief on the Impact of Covid-19 on Ukrainian Labour Migrants in the EU

ICMPD has published a new policy brief on the Impact of COVID-19 on Ukrainian Labour Migrants in 4 European countries: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Italy.

The policy brief scrutinises the main effects of the coronavirus pandemic on Ukrainian labour migrants. Labour migrants from Ukraine form the largest group of foreign workers in the European Union (EU) and large populations are working in Poland, Italy, Czech Republic and Hungary.

New EU Strategy on Victim's Rights

On June 24, the European Commission published its Strategy on Victims’ Rights (2020-2025) and promoting five key priorities.

ECHR publishes judgement on Article 4 - Prohibition of Slavery & Forced Labour

On June 25th, the Grand Chamber of the ECHR published its judgment in the case of S.M. v. Croatia finding unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 4 (Prohibition of Slavery/Prohibition of Forced Labour) of the European Convention on Human Rights.